Re: Explanation of 2 Rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kerin, hi David

Am 26.08.20 um 08:49 schrieb kfm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Your interpretation appears correct to me.

Thank you for your Answer! :-)


/*           sNO, sSS, sSR, sES, sFW, sCW, sLA, sTW, sCL, sS2   */
/*synack*/ { sIV, sIV, sSR, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sIV, sSR },

That was a great help, but it is really heavy stuff. It's hard to work through these tables and to understand them in context. While testing I found that the xmas-statement is a rather weak protection, because it seems to check for an explicit match of all given flags. If I use the flags in various combinations...

nmap 10.0.1.200 --scanflags "URG ACK PSH RST SYN FIN" -p 631

...it is noticeable, that some Packages was not recognized at all. But the check for 'invalid' was always successful. Conclusion: The xmas-statement is not a good choice.

I believe that the problem can be closed. Thanks again for your help.

Best Regards, Tom



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux