Re: Weird/High CPU usage caused by LOG target

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 27.12.19 um 02:29 schrieb Tom Yan:
> Hi Reindl,
> 
> Hmm. Not sure I get what you mean. Are you saying that this could be a
> "generic" kernel flaw (in handling logging / messages), instead of a
> Netfilter-specific issue?

dunno, but since no longer using "-j LOG" the f**g randomly crashes of
our production firewall system over months hwich nearly made me insane
are gone and that it spits to "dmesg" is ugly anyways

when i try to debug crashes, enable kexec/kdump and the only thing it
has to do is write my whole filesystem full with 100 lines iptables
related messages from dmesg repeatet until the is no space available i
am done

> On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 08:23, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 26.12.19 um 23:29 schrieb Duncan Roe:
>>> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 11:05:33AM +0800, Tom Yan wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> So I was trying to log all traffics in the FORWARD chain with the LOG
>>>> target in iptables (while I say all, it's just some VPN server/client
>>>> that is used by only me, and the tests were just opening some
>>>> website).
>>>>
>>>> I notice that the logging causes high CPU usage (so it goes up only
>>>> when there are traffics). In (h)top, the usage shows up as openvpn's
>>>> if the forwarding involves their tuns. Say I am forwarding from one
>>>> tun to another, each of the openvpn instance will max out one core on
>>>> my raspberry pi 3 b+. (And that actually slows the whole system down,
>>>> like ssh/bash responsiveness, and stalls the traffic flow.) If I do
>>>> not log, or log with the NFLOG target instead, their CPU usage will be
>>>> less than 1%.
>>>>
>>>> Interestingly, the problem seems to be way less obvious if I am using
>>>> it on higher end devices (like my Haswell PC, or even a raspberry pi
>>>> 4). There are still "spikes" as well, but it won't make me "notice"
>>>> the problem, at least not when I am just doing some trivial web
>>>> browsing.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know how I can further help debugging, if any of you are
>>>> interested in fixing this.
>>>>
>>> Just in case you missed it, be sure that your logger is configured not to sync
>>> the file system after every logging. That is the default action btw.
>>>
>>> I have used large-volume logging in the past and never encountered a CPU problem
>>> (but had to run logrotate every minute to avoid filling the disk)
>>
>> the problem is "-j LOG" at it's own and not suprisingly after having
>> enough of random crashes and kexec only spits the disk full of
>> demsg-output from iptables "-j LOG" switching awy to NFLOG and ulogd and
>> never ever faced antother crash
>>
>> "-j LOG" spits into kernel ring buffer and by it's own produces double
>> load no matter what happns after the action



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux