Hi, On Thu, 14 Nov 2019, İbrahim Ercan wrote: > I'm also wondering why port numbers are not interpreted with protocol on > bitmap:port while hash kind sets are. I'd would glad to hear from a > netfilter developer. The bitmap family is the earliest and the types kept their original functionality (apart from the extensions). In the case of the hash types it was easy to add the protocol number to the port while in the bitmap case it'd be not so simple. Best regards, Jozsef > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:25 AM A L <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to understand if ipset "bitmap:port" should support protocol > > or not. Based on the name"bitmap:port" it should only store one value > > per row, and not tuple like "bitmap:ip,mac" does. However the examples > > in the manual suggests it should? > > > > ... > - E-mail : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlecsik.jozsef@xxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
