Re: Whither masquerading RANDOM_FULLY?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Spreitzer <mspreitz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Mike Spreitzer <mspreitz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > ...  I am concerned about 
> > > the cases where port translation is done.  ....
> > 
> > The function in question is only supposed to be invoked when either
> > RANDOM or RANDOM_FULLY bit is set, or if there is a collision and the
> > tuple can't be used as-is.
> 
> The latter alternative is when port translation has to be done, right?

Yes, RANDOM|RANDOM_FULLY force port translation, default is the only do
it if the port can't be used as-is due to conflict.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux