Re: problem with limit rate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



GM <grzesiek20@xxxxxx> wrote:
> When i include burst in my ruleset it works as expected with burst. I
> simulate this with nmap --bad-sum but when there is no burst e.g delay
> between packets is 1s
> nmap --bad-sum --scan-delay 1s
> behavior is very strange because it drops 60 packets instead of 30. How to
> explain this ?

It first consumes the burst, then the rate.

nft limit works like -m limit in iptables.

If you want the '1s delay' case to match on 30 packets, try a burst
value of 1.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux