> On Apr 30, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Philip Prindeville <philipp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 30, 2018, at 1:43 AM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 2018-04-30 02:06, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>> /* Use simple integer vector files */
>>> if (nfproto == NFPROTO_IPV6) {
>>> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), GEOIP_DB_DIR "/%s.iv6", code);
>>> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), GEOIP_DB_DIR "/cc/%s.iv6", code);
>>> } else {
>>> - snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), GEOIP_DB_DIR "/%s.iv4", code);
>>> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), GEOIP_DB_DIR "/cc/%s.iv4", code);
>>> }
>>
>> Why would this 5th patch be necessary? The integer vector
>> format did not change, did it?
>
>
> I’m working (in the next round of patches) to add ISP support as well, and don’t want them both in the same directories so I’ll be using subdirectories…
>
>
I think I answered the above pending question and followed up with a v3 set which had more functionality last month.
I’m wondering if there are changes I can make to advance this patch set or is it not going to proceed?
Thanks,
-Philip
