Re: nft - no equivalency to ipset hash:port:hash for differing sized subnets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/13/2018 01:36 AM, Fran Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> One feature that I've noticed is missing is that there is no
> hash:port:hash equivalent in nftables, which I'm starting to think is
> quite a big gap.

Postscript:

If you actually meant "hash:net,port,net" it's one of the express
examples at the bottom of the Concatenations page under the "Some ipset
types" heading.

https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Concatenations

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux