Hello,
Upgrading my gateway rig, my iptables rules broke for some protocols.
I tracked the issue down to the conntrack rules regarding RELATED packets.
On a clean archlinux install (that is a 4.13.8 kernel with iptables v1.6.1, conntrack-tools v1.4.4), I do this :
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -t raw -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 21 -j CT --helper ftp
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED -m helper --helper ftp -j ACCEPT
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate RELATED -j ACCEPT
=> That gives :
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -nvL
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 333 packets, 32326 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ctstate RELATED helper match "ftp"
0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ctstate RELATED
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 235 packets, 30284 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -nvL -t raw
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 6 packets, 470 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 4 packets, 464 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 CT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:21 CT helper ftp
and lsmod shows :
Module Size Used by
nf_conntrack_netlink 36864 0
nfnetlink 16384 1 nf_conntrack_netlink
xt_helper 16384 1
iptable_filter 16384 1
xt_conntrack 16384 2
nf_conntrack_ftp 20480 1
nf_conntrack_ipv4 16384 4
nf_defrag_ipv4 16384 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
xt_tcpudp 16384 1
iptable_raw 16384 1
xt_CT 16384 1
nf_conntrack 110592 6 nf_conntrack_ftp,nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_helper,nf_conntrack_netlink,xt_CT,xt_conntrack
libcrc32c 16384 1 nf_conntrack
[...]
ip_tables 24576 2 iptable_filter,iptable_raw
x_tables 32768 7 ip_tables,iptable_filter,xt_tcpudp,iptable_raw,xt_helper,xt_CT,xt_conntrack
[...]
I follow the conntrack events for expect with "conntrack -E expect", and i another shell I initiate a PASSIVE FTP session.
Here's what I get :
[root@archlinux ~]# conntrack -E expect
[NEW] 300 proto=6 src=10.0.2.15 dst=212.27.60.27 sport=0 dport=45647 mask-src=255.255.255.255 mask-dst=255.255.255.255 sport=0 dport=65535 master-src=10.0.2.15 master-dst=212.27.60.27 sport=54004 dport=21 class=0 helper=ftp
[DESTROY] 300 proto=6 src=10.0.2.15 dst=212.27.60.27 sport=0 dport=45647 mask-src=255.255.255.255 mask-dst=255.255.255.255 sport=0 dport=65535 master-src=10.0.2.15 master-dst=212.27.60.27 sport=54004 dport=21 class=0 helper=ftp
[NEW] 300 proto=6 src=10.0.2.15 dst=212.27.60.27 sport=0 dport=27314 mask-src=255.255.255.255 mask-dst=255.255.255.255 sport=0 dport=65535 master-src=10.0.2.15 master-dst=212.27.60.27 sport=54004 dport=21 class=0 helper=ftp
[DESTROY] 300 proto=6 src=10.0.2.15 dst=212.27.60.27 sport=0 dport=27314 mask-src=255.255.255.255 mask-dst=255.255.255.255 sport=0 dport=65535 master-src=10.0.2.15 master-dst=212.27.60.27 sport=54004 dport=21 class=0 helper=ftp
...so far, so good.
In the raw tables, we see that the packets are correctly assigned the ftp helper :
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -nvL -t raw
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 175 packets, 16587 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 112 packets, 13182 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
19 853 CT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:21 CT helper ftp
BUT in the filter table, the RELATED ctstate is not matched...
[root@archlinux ~]# iptables -nvL
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 227 packets, 20645 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ctstate RELATED helper match "ftp"
0 0 ACCEPT all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ctstate RELATED
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 140 packets, 17006 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
This is on a VM freshly built for the occasion, but I have the same behavior on real hardware (plain intel x64 PC).
Obviously I'm missing something. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?
King regards,
Marc Fundenberger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
