Re: Why can't we use DNAT in the INPUT Chain?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 07:07:41PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 19/08/2017 à 16:16, khawar shehzad a écrit :
[SNIP]
> > My solution is like the following, which is not working.
> >
> > table ip6 natcap {
> >          map natcap_vmap {
> >                  type ipv6_addr . ipv6_addr : verdict
> >                  elements = { 2001::20 . 2001::1:0:0:2 : accept}
> >          }
> >          chain prerouting_filter {
> >                  type filter hook prerouting priority -101; policy drop;
> >                  ip6 saddr . ip6 daddr vmap @natcap_vmap
> >          }
> (...)
>
> What is this syntax ? This is not iptables.
It's nftables, the reason I joined this list (to get my head around nftables ;)

Cheers ... Duncan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux