Re: Why is --in-interface illegal in POSTROUTING?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Robert.
Through POSTROUTING hook both forwarded packets and local originated
packets pass. Obviously, there isn't input interface information in
local originated packets. I don't know better way to do what you want
than using of marks.

2017-07-04 2:56 GMT+03:00 Robert White <rwhite@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Someone just pointed out that --in-interface is not legal in the
> POSTROUTING rules. I can think of several reasons to use this
> information directly at that point (instead of redundant marking ans so
> forth).
>
> Does the in-interface information get lost somehow or is that just an
> arbitrary restriction?
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Anton.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux