Re: Year missing from ulogd2 timestamp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hmm. Odd. What OS are you on? I am on U16.04. How important are the
timestamps to you? Note that the log collector can add timestamps as
well.

Did you modprobe appropriately?
modprobe nf_conntrack_netlink
modprobe nf_conntrack_ipv4

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Muhammad Faisal <faisalusuf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kurien,
> Please see the nf_conntrack_timestamp giving error is it the correct command?
>
> [root@wc01 ~]# /bin/echo "1"> /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp
> -bash: /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp: No such file or directory
> [root@wc01 ~]# cat /proc/sys
> sys/           sysrq-trigger  sysvipc/
> [root@wc01 ~]# cat /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_
> nf_conntrack_acct
> nf_conntrack_buckets
> nf_conntrack_checksum
> nf_conntrack_count
> nf_conntrack_events
> nf_conntrack_events_retry_timeout
> nf_conntrack_expect_max
> nf_conntrack_generic_timeout
> nf_conntrack_icmp_timeout
> nf_conntrack_log_invalid
> nf_conntrack_max
> nf_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal
> nf_conntrack_tcp_loose
> nf_conntrack_tcp_max_retrans
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close_wait
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_fin_wait
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_last_ack
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_max_retrans
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_recv
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_syn_sent
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_time_wait
> nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_unacknowledged
> nf_conntrack_udp_timeout
> nf_conntrack_udp_timeout_stream
> nf_log/
> Best Regards,
> Muhammad Faisal
>
> Disclaimer:
> Information in this e-mail and attachments is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. Only intended recipients are authorized to use it.
> If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all
> copies of the message from your system and notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail. I'm neither liable for incomplete
> transmission of the information in this communication nor for damage
> caused by any virus transmitted through this e-mail.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:04 AM, V Kurien <kurien.varugis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Don't you have to enable timestamp and byte logging support?
>> /bin/echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct
>> /bin/echo "1"> /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Muhammad Faisal <faisalusuf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I would like to understand is this a feature or a possible bug that
>>> Year info is missing from the ulogd2 output.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mar 11 15:55:59 wc01 ulogd[14289]: [NEW] ORIG: SRC=5.55.22.172
>>> DST=192.168.1.3 PROTO=TCP SPT=2083 DPT=5158 PKTS=0 BYTES=0 , REPLY:
>>> SRC=192.168.1.3 DST=5.55.22.172 PROTO=TCP SPT=5158 DPT=2083 PKTS=0
>>> BYTES=0
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Muhammad Faisal
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux