Re: nftables: Dynamically updating sets gives syntax error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On tir, 2016-07-12 at 17:22 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 04:12:56PM +0200, Anders K. Pedersen wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On lør, 2016-06-25 at 15:30 +0200, Anders K. Pedersen wrote:
> > > With nftables 0.6 I'm getting a syntax error, when I try to use
> > > the
> > > feature that was introduced
> > > by http://git.netfilter.org/nftables/commit
> > > /?id=a9467e55973b10c2e8fe37525514c961580f8506 . For example:
> > > 
> > > # nft filter input set add tcp dport @myset
> > > <cmdline>:1:26-30: Error: syntax error, unexpected dport
> > > filter input set add tcp dport @myset
> > >                          ^^^^^
> > > # nft filter input set add ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > > <cmdline>:1:25-29: Error: syntax error, unexpected saddr
> > > filter input set add ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > >                         ^^^^^
> > > # nft filter input set update ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > > <cmdline>:1:28-32: Error: syntax error, unexpected saddr
> > > filter input set update ip saddr timeout 10s @myset
> > >                            ^^^^^
> > 
> > I did a git bisect on this and found that it was broken by
> > 
> > commit a3e60492a684be09374d0649735da42bdadc6b48
> > Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Sun Dec 27 22:15:17 2015 +0100
> > 
> >     parser: restrict relational rhs expression recursion
> > 
> > After studying it a bit I reverted a part of it with the following
> > change, which made the commands above work again:
> > 
> > --- a/src/parser_bison.y
> > +++ b/src/parser_bison.y
> > @@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ set_elem_option		:	TIMEO
> > UT			time_spec
> >  			}
> >  			;
> >  
> > -set_lhs_expr		:	concat_rhs_expr
> > +set_lhs_expr		:	concat_expr
> >  			|	multiton_rhs_expr
> >  			;
> >  
> > The commit message indicated that it intended to handle rhs
> > expressions, but this is a lhs expression, so maybe this change was
> > unintended?
> 
> Thanks for reporting. This results however in shift/reduce conflicts
> in the grammar, just sent patches to address this:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/647448/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/647447/
> 
> Please, test and let me know if this works for you. Thanks.

I applied these patches on top of current nftables git, and tested that
they solve the problem. Thanks for fixing this.

Regards,
Anders K. Pedersen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux