Re: Packet disappears after DNAT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 2:31 AM, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IIUC, you're looping back traffic on a bridge interface.

That sounds right.  The packet arrives on virbr0, and I want to send it
right back where it came from.

> Bridge-nf is
> enabled by default and can cause weird behaviour with NAT. Try to
> disable it :
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables
>
> Without that, after DNAT, the packet is not routed but bridged. But I
> suspect that the bridge code won't forward it back to its original port
> due to its source MAC address.

It still times out.  Is it worth installing the logging to see if the
packet is still disappearing at the DNAT step?  Guessing no.

Maybe I can DNAT the source MAC too?  :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux