Re: Why isn't DNAT happening for host-originated packets?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's an awesome graph, but all (non-tap) paths pass through
nat:PREROUTING, don't they?

Now I'm even more confused why host-generated packets seem to skip it.  :)

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Noel Kuntze <noel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Look at the packet flow graph. That's fairly up to date (but is missing the new *nat INPUT chain).
> http://inai.de/images/nf-packet-flow.png
>
> - --
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards,
> Noel Kuntze
>
> GPG Key ID: 0x63EC6658
> Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWYMzPAAoJEDg5KY9j7GZYKPsP/189soz785huEAVPb2vpaSEA
> QOGGJ0N2+amRccHSiMmDE/fnI4MRCUUWbiDS0PBJBSC0aKjhDkA7JRej8oWJaJYx
> Mjw6VhGmpwRHG5x1bWPcrj+Zx3EXYNOkVhZwu/SPgnagnUMtcN7y2SYtNwlArlAA
> twZhoKaVwB75NLqMzcOPNe68kyCyoE7wQNZcczR1HDURs6lWqQh7IyaRKQbX98aa
> J1oC6I5e4fqET90PcK2OC1txTRmdyPCCrLqU0yrceV1nO0QEQx+GSIsg+sz5dl9f
> Beno5AxzNEaeb0Bifq/PbmwKdTY2jC7QM+4/efwt4jXq/kkiV+VHu91LBbwEFPuM
> 0JLu9FVpSkXO+e8yVO2KoURYWBN0vKPKvs1qxf5Q37fFiDXmpKlrDS24ZE32xyja
> suBREsiAfz7z97NED/0pDQhU1Cf3TJBXHp0kWJSPRZAg7GYI1lnEkMutkD61wVj+
> /pNCO7MlLZ2ls8qZZpn7BJW8KoNt5N50DmJ/37zCD3kRHiHlG5OCX4vj2EcssRdz
> aQ+HW76S0Bqg+svikkPmBXQvLemh99/izt0DZyJKfC8JpVJhDDj0BallpD4JuZTi
> 5J2+9dmdgY7js+ATAEvSjT0zj/l3M8sxuqi+NSIWan8eHzWxRm8SRCIl5uQdK8f3
> rL/oXXhfJCy8ZRzNSp2T
> =jtdy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux