tc filter connmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear All,

I would be glad if you could help me out. I am running the following script:

-------------- cut - here -----------------

iptables -t mangle -N QOS
iptables -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth0 -j QOS
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -j QOS
iptables -t mangle -A QOS -j MARK --set-mark 3

iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 3 -j ACCEPT ### (counter)

tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
    match u32 0 0 classid :1 \
action xt -j CONNMARK --save-mark

tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress handle ffff:
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
    match u32 0 0 classid :1 \
action xt -j CONNMARK --restore-mark

-------------- cut - here -----------------

Now if I insert (-I) in "PREROUTING" a "CONNMARK --restore-mark", my counter shows that egress filter "tc filter ... parent 1: ... CONNMARK --save-mark"marked them correctly.

However, if I remove the "CONNMARK --restore-mark" from "PREROUTING" my counter shows no traffic. This means that the ingress filter "tc filter ... parent ffff: ... CONNMARK --restore-mark" is not working.

I tried this on latest Archlinux, Fedora 20 and Debian 7.6 and everywhere I get the same behaviour.What am I doing wrong?

Regards, George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux