Re: nftables, after adding a rule without any action, nft doesn't return correctly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:13:12AM +0900, Ryo Fujita wrote:
> Hi Pablo-san and all,
> 
> Thank you so much!
> You made me clear.
> 
> > You can add rules without any action.
> 
> I understand it’s the spec not a bug.
> 
> > Try -n to disabling name resolution:
> > 
> > # nft -n list table inet filter
> 
> 
> Yes, I check that reverse lookup fails as you pointed out.
> 
> >> My environment was as followings.
> >> nftables-0.100-3.20140704git.fc21.x86_64
> > 
> > Please, use latest when testing.
> > 
> > http://www.netfilter.org/projects/nftables/downloads.html
> 
> 
> The reason why I’m using the slight old version is to write a
> magazine article introducing nftables. It’s easy for readers to
> install the version I checked with RPM or archive like
> 'nftables-0.3’.  Anyway, I’ll test the latest before sending a
> report to this ML.

Not a good idea to stick to old versions. We're still changing syntax
in some aspects and resolving bugs at this stage. The user document
aims to be in sync with latest. You should recommend people to stick
to latest until 1.0 comes out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux