Re: eth - NAT - Bridge - veth

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



you are right. No idea what made it work :)

one thing different from your original instruction was my sysctl
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 didnt work couple of times it said 'unknown key'
3rd try it did not complain but after some tests I saw the forwarding
was not set and I had to set it by writing 1 into /proc... ip_foward

I will post it once I find out, but so far good.

Thx.

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Vijay Viswanathan a écrit :
>> adding -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED seems to do the trick.
>>
>> iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -d 10.4.38.182 --dport
>> 2300 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.2:2300
>
> Not in any way. The chains of the nat table see only packets in the NEW
> state so this match is completely superflous. Besides, normal TCP
> packets have the NEW or ESTABLISHED state.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux