Re: Implications of a permissive FORWARD chain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Amos Jeffries <squid3 <at> treenet.co.nz> writes:

> Like you surmised earlier the implications for the client hosts is the 
> same as if your forwarding host was not there at all.

That is a salient point, Amos.

In my case, it can be argued that that's exactly what is desired. But I
agree that there are some rules that can be added to tighten things up
without unduly hampering someone who wants to add a VM or container in the
future. Spoofing can be curtailed, for example.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux