Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: release conntrack from rcu callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Florian,

2014/1/7 Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Andrew Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> >                 ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
>> >                 if (unlikely(nf_ct_is_dying(ct) ||
>> >                              !atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)))
>> >                     // which means we should hit this path (0 ref).
>> >                         h = NULL;
>> >                 else {
>> >                     // otherwise, it cannot go away from under us, since
>> >                     // we own a reference now.
>> >                         if (unlikely(!nf_ct_tuple_equal(tuple, &h->tuple) ||
>> >                                      nf_ct_zone(ct) != zone)) {
>
> Perhaps this needs additional !nf_ct_is_confirmed()?

Yes, it think it must help. Thank you for the comments. I resent this patch:
[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get

>
> It would cover your case (found a recycled element that has been put on
> the unconfirmed list (refcnt already set to 1, ct->tuple is set) on another cpu,
> extensions possibly not yet fully initialised), and the same tuple).
>
> Regards,
> Florian

Thanks,
Andrey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux