Do you want to respond with ACK, FIN, or RST? jack seth <bird_112@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Ok, if you have an 'accept' rule for a service that is not currently >running, is it possible to have iptables to simply not respond instead >of reporting the port as 'closed'? During a port scan at grc.com, if >the router doesn't reply the port will be reported as 'stealth'. > -- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
