Re: MASQUERADE/SNAT and multiple interfaces with the same IP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Does this mean that even when using SNAT, the old mapping is deleted
>> and a new created?
>
> No.

Thank you very much for the help, I see now that I was a little bit
too fast and missed a detail in nf_nat_oif_changed(). If anyone ever
stumbles across the question in the future: SNAT does not set
masq_index and, thus, nf_nat_oif_changed() will always return false.

Have a nice weekend!

-Kristian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux