Hi Jimmy, Why don't you use interface bonding/teaming for having multiple interfaces with single IP address? Best regards, On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is it possible to use SNAT like this? (what I'm really asking is whether one can use the ingress interface as part of the NAT tuple): >> >> LINUX >> eth0 <-------- ROUTER ----------- 10.0.1.0/24 >> \\\\\\\------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> \\\\\\------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> \\\\\------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> \\\\------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> \\\------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> \\------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> \------------ 10.0.1.0/24 >> >> Each private / internal address is the same on every interface. I plan to use >> unnumbered interfaces and proxy ARP at the linux level. >> > > Hi Alex, > > I don't really get what you are trying to achieve. Can you detail a > little bit more? > > > Jimmy > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
