Re: [mangle table] end rule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.01.2013 21:42, richard lucassen wrote:
I have these two rules in this order:

iptables -t mangle -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j CONNMARK --set-mark 1
iptables -t mangle -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.2 -j CONNMARK --set-mark 2

This site
http://www.linode.com/wiki/index.php/Netfilter_IPTables_Mini_Howto#mangle_Table
says:

<quote>
It is important to notice when making rules that whichever rule matches
first will be the target for the packet and no other rules will be
checked.
</quote>

As far as I understand the English language, this means that a packet
towards 10.0.0.2 will be marked "1" and not "2" as the first rule
matches and thus the other rules will not be tested.

But in practice, destination 10.0.0.2 will be marked with "2" in the
order mentioned above. This is no what the site says.

Question: is a mangle rule really an end rule as the site suggests? Or
is this not true ("man iptables" says nothing about it AFAICS). Or is
it true and do I have to report a bug?

That depends if the target is a "non-terminating target" or not.
i.e
MARK, CONNMARK, LOG  are non-terminating.
ACCEPT, DROP, RETURN are.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux