Hi Jan, Thanks for the quick reply. That make sense; however now I just need to find a way to modify my rules to account for that :) Thanks. Steve. -----Original Message----- From: Jan Engelhardt [mailto:jengelh@xxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, 7 January 2013 3:55 AM To: Steve (Telsat Broadband) Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: FW: Packets missing the NAT table On Sunday 2013-01-06 17:08, Steve (Telsat Broadband) wrote: >Hi All, > >I?m just trying to debug an issue on our network and I?ve noticed that >some packets are being missed from some rules in the NAT table. > >Do all packets go through the NAT table or is there some exclusion? >I?m seeing the packet hitting the mangle table as well as the filter >table, but not the NAT? The nat table is a configuration database of sorts that is only consulted when necessary. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
