Re: connmark problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 11:38 +0300, Oguz Yilmaz wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I use connmark in raw table. Please look at the following -L output.
> At the beginning of the chain I copy packet mark to the connection. -m
> mark matches packets. However -m connmark not matches. It is clearly
> visible from packet counters.
> How can we explain this?

I'm guessing this is because the raw table is traversed before
connection tracking. See:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/37/Netfilter-packet-flow.svg

Andy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux