Re: Confusion about filtering traffic in a bridge scenario

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 00:58, Marc <ccc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was/am trying to setup packet filtering on a virtualisation host and
> couldnt get it to work and was hoping for some pointers.
>
> Heres the setup:
>
> Said host has:
> eth0 - the physical interface, no address assigned
> br0 - the bridge interface, has IP 10.0.0.1 and gateway and default
> route assigned to it
> veth0 - the virtual interface for one of the VMs, has IP 192.168.0.1
>
> both eth0 and veth0 are added to the bridge, the networking setup is
> functional, however I seem to be unable to filter traffic to the VM with
> iptables

do you use /etc/network/interfaces to create the bridge interface?

I've noticed in Debian that sysctl.conf is applied before the
if-up.d/bridge script has a chance to load the bridge module. as a
result, the sysctl for net.bridge remain the default.
i needed to add a post-up to my config to overcome this

what is the current setting of net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables?

does re-applying sysctl.conf allow iptables to then pick up bridged
traffic (sysctl -p)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux