Re: bridges are not self contained

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2011-08-29 17:16, naruto canada wrote:
>>>
>>>I am a new user of ebtales. (bridges) Just started experimenting, I 
>>>run into one problem immediately: all the bridges can see traffic on 
>>>ethernet card that are NOT connected to the bridges.
>>
>>On what do you base this assertion?
>
>Hold on, I think have a physically loop, I will disconnect that line, 
>and make sure it is not from another physical switch, then I can be 
>sure it is the kernel (or bridge code) that is forwarding the packets.
>
>Answering your question: I know they are vitual bridges, but should not 
>be magical (kernel should not automatically send broadcast packets onto 
>all vitual bridges without passing through ports connected to them.)

(For starters, don't strip the cc.)

Nobody but you said they are magical (or virtual for that matter), so 
the question was merely implying that you may have a configuration 
error, or using bugzilla terms: "WORKSFORME".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux