Re: xtables latency?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(forgot cc: list first time around)

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 14:51, Marek Kierdelewicz <marek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>Has anyone ever researched the latency of xtables when a Linux box
>>functions as a firewall?
>
> This paper is a nice read:
> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CE0QFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcourseware.ee.calpoly.edu%2F3comproject%2FPublished%2520Papers%2Fsecurity.pdf&rct=j&q=iptables%20netfilter%20latency%20paper%20pdf&ei=2pI_Tu-VKITJswbov5Qg&usg=AFQjCNFjUZwGHDhdBhtxwQgqlQbYCMjBFw&cad=rja
>

Whoa, very nice paper! Thanks for the link; my Google-fu failed to find that

> It's very detailed on the issue of rule overhead (Conclusion 5.1 b).
> Unfortunately paper is from 2002. Since then most of the code was
> rewritten. Maybe we, as netfilter community, should lobby some
> university professor to let his students do a *remake* of this
> work ;-). Anyone here with ties to education sector?
>

A 'remake' would be okay, IMO, since both the hardware platform *and*
the code itself have been evolving.

Maybe with more test cases/scenarios, and a *huge* and/or comples
iptables rules :-)

Rgds,
-- 
Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~

 • Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
 • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux