Re: [PATCH] slob: push the min alignment to long long

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:23 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > I don't agree. I think we should either provide defaults that work for
> > everyone and let architectures override them (which AFAICT Christoph's
> > patch does) or we flat out #error if architectures don't specify
> > alignment requirements.
> 
> Uh, isn't the latter precisely what I say above?
> 
> >  The current solution seems to be the worst one
> > from practical point of view.
> 
> Good, because no one's advocating for it.

Sorry, I totally misunderstood what you wrote!

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux