Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset 6.5 released

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 22 May 2011, Mr Dash Four wrote:

> > If you want me to be able to reproduce and fix the issue, please send me the
> > full data you used. I assumed the restore files you sent me contained the
> > case where the segfaults popped up. Apparently it's not, because there's no
> > such commands in them.
> >   
> Try this and let me know how far do you get:
> 
> n priviledged-ports bitmap:port range 1-1023 timeout 0
> a priviledged-ports 1-1023
> n test-net bitmap:ip range 10.1.1.172/29 timeout 0
> a test-net 10.1.1.172/29
> n test-ports bitmap:port range 12770-19999 timeout 0
> a test-ports 12770-12784
> a test-ports 19999
> n test-port bitmap:port range 29950-29950 timeout 0
> a test-port 29950
> COMMIT

Thanks, that helped a lot! The ipset binary doesn't handle different sets 
in a single restore file. I'll fix it in the next days.

Best regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux