Re: iptables-save bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 20:28, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Friday 2011-03-18 13:44, Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>Is instead saved as:
>>
>>-A PREROUTING -m conntrack --ctstate Â-m comment --comment "Don\'t
>>process untracked" -j ACCEPT
>>
>>(i.e., the "UNTRACKED" option is missing)
>>
>>I don't know if the other --ctstate options are also missing.
>>
>>Details:
>>- iptables -v == v1.4.4
>>- uname -a == "Linux aeacus-4 2.6.32-29-generic-pae #58-Ubuntu SMP Fri
>>Feb 11 19:15:25 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux"
>
> Well yeah if you want bugfixes, you will have to update.
>

Ah, so it's a known bug then?

No problem. Sorry for any inconvenience :-)

Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux