[PATCH 4/4] Fix variable assignment in ip_vs_notrack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

There's no sense to 'ct = ct = ' in ip_vs_notrack(). Just assign
nf_ct_get()'s return value directly to the pointer variable 'ct' once.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/net/ip_vs.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/ip_vs.h b/include/net/ip_vs.h
index e74da41e..1dcb75d 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_vs.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_vs.h
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ static inline void ip_vs_notrack(struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 #if defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) || defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MODULE)
 	enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo;
-	struct nf_conn *ct = ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
+	struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_get(skb, &ctinfo);
 
 	if (!ct || !nf_ct_is_untracked(ct)) {
 		nf_reset(skb);
-- 
1.7.2.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux