On 02/02/2011 11:01, Srinivasa T N wrote:
umm... more actions on packets = more processing... so yes, Netflow accounting will produce a CPU overhead.Hi All,I am using ipt_NETFLOW 1.7 on my RHEL 6 (2.6.32) box. Now if I want to accept packet destined for some port and at the same time I want it to be accounted also, then I have to use the following rules:iptables -A INPUT --dport <portnum> -j NETFLOW iptables -A INPUT --dport <portnum> -j ACCEPTThis makes that every packet that I accept should have two rules (one for accepting and one for accounting). Don't you people think that it will increase the number of rules a packet has to traverse? Or is my understanding wrong?
No such thing as a free lunch :-) -- Best Regards, Giles Coochey NetSecSpec Ltd NL T-Systems Mobile: +31 681 265 086 NL Mobile: +31 626 508 131 GIB Mobile: +350 5401 6693 Email/MSN/Live Messenger: giles@xxxxxxxxxxx Skype: gilescoochey
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature