Re: [HELP] why the string match does not work in nat tables?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/01/11 03:47, JeHo Park wrote:
> hello jan
> i see, i took mistake. Ccs.. :-)
> anyway, i wonder why there is no TCP payload in the skb of the string
> or wurl match.

Because you only see the first packet of the flow in the NAT table.

You should use the string match in the filter or raw tables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux