Re: [HELP] why the string match does not work in nat tables?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2011-01-31 03:47, JeHo Park wrote:

(Might as well avoid top posting?)

>hello jan
>i see, i took mistake. Ccs.. :-)
>anyway, i wonder why there is no TCP payload in the skb of the string
>or wurl match.

Because TCP packets are allowed to have no payload.


>On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Jan Engelhardt  wrote:
>> *sigh* don't strip the Ccs
>>
>> On Monday 2011-01-31 03:24, JeHo Park wrote:
>>>On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Jan Engelhardt  wrote:
>>>> On Monday 2011-01-31 02:53, JeHo Park wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>the string match works well in filter table, but it does not work in NAT.
>>>>
>>>> Oh it _does_ work in nat.
>>>>
>>>> But given that the nat table is an abstract configuration database
>>>> rather than a filter, not all packets do a lookup.
>>>
>>>but i found in runtime with debugging code, there is no TCP data but
>>>only TCP header in the skbuff of string match.
>>
>> Good, then this issue is resolved.
>>
>>
>>>>>i used following iptables rules
>>>>># Âiptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp --dport 80 -m string --string
>>>>>"goole.com" --algo bm -j DNAT --to-destination 10.10.10.125:80
>>
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux