On 11/01/11 17:21, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On 11/Jan/11 15:41, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> On Tuesday 2011-01-11 13:35, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> this is clearly an overworked topic. However, I haven't been able to >>> find definitive info about it. Please help providing more insight. >>> In particular, if it is possible/convenient to design an RST injector >>> and how to attach it to iptables? >> >> If you use a ruleset that emits RST for NEW connections that are picked >> up rather than SYN-new, >> >> -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -p tcp ! --syn --dport 22 -j REJECT >> --reject-with tcp-reset >> >> .. makes it possible to RST-kill connections using `conntrack -D`. > > That's the most elegant method I've seen thus far. Thanks a lot! > > A generic rule like that (i.e. without --dport) is mentioned in the > tutorial http://www.iptables.info/en/iptables-problems.html#NEWNOTSYN > but I never realized it can be used this way. (I CC this there.) I'll try to add this to the conntrack-tools manual, it's indeed good. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html