On 21/12/10 21:22, David Miller wrote: > From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:19:40 +0100 > >> I think that this approach (see patch) is safe to fix this problem. > > This is fine for now, but really you should have a copy of the > headers in your tree. > > It's the only way to sanely control the build in all possible > scenerios. The kernel headers are just too large of a variable > for things like this. I was thinking on the overhead that this adds since we have to keep in sync kernel and library header files. If there's some new feature in the kernel, you'll have to wait until the new stuff in included in the libmnl header. But this is indeed a problem since people will report compilation problems. I'll make a patch to add them. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
