Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
From: Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:04:08 +0100
Cc: netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1010161948580.29809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23

ip6tables-save, or its respective v4 part.

iptables-save | grep NOTRACK returns nothing, so I assume that I am notusing this.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
  - From: Mr Dash Four

References:
- NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
  - From: Mr Dash Four
- Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
  - From: Jan Engelhardt
- Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
  - From: Mr Dash Four
- Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
  - From: Jan Engelhardt

Prev by Date: Re: Time counter of connections (libnetfilter-conntrack?)
Next by Date: Re: Time counter of connections (libnetfilter-conntrack?)
Previous by thread: Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
Next by thread: Re: NAT-PMP connections not tracked with nf_conntrack
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux