Re: decipher the secmark number from nf_conntrack/ip_conntrack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2010-09-21 23:00, Eric Paris wrote:
>
>My current patch looks like so:
>
>cat /proc/net/nfs_conntrack
>
>ipv4     2 udp      17 8 src=10.11.231.82 dst=10.11.255.156
>sport=34095 dport=53 src=10.11.255.156 dst=10.11.231.82 sport=53
>dport=34095 mark=0 secmark=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t:s0 use=2

I think that rather than bloating ancient procfs files with more info,
the respective userspace tool should be augmented by secmark name
resolution instead. Then we would also not need change anything inside
the kernel, or its interfaces to userspace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux