On 08/04/10 03:08, Alex Bligh wrote:
R1 might or might not be connected to BBI, or R1/C1 might be in 1918
space
Ok.
OK - that looks promising. I'd only investigated iptables & ebtables.
*nod*
Note BBI hangs of BR1 not R1 - I think that makes things easier.
Seeing as how BR1 is a bridge and router, it doesn't make that much
difference.
I presume there is a route step here, but C1' is designed to be on
the correct interface.
Yes.
The reply traffic will be routed at layer 3, and then at layer 2 will be
altered from the one layer 3 (that was routed) to the proper layer 3
(that isn't routed).
Sure - thanks.
I've done some more thinking and I strongly believe that what needs to
be done can be, I just don't have a way to test this at the moment. (I
will see if I have some time this weekend to throw together a VM.)
That's actually quite simple, as because BBI is not behind R1, all
the non-intercepted traffic is simply bridged.
*nod*
Grant. . . .
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
