Re: [conntrackd] Question about expect table sync

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Todor,

On 02/07/10 09:31, todor.gamishev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
> 
> Pablo Neira Ayuso a écrit :
>> We are not synchronizing the expectation table but we do synchronize
>> confirmed expectations that are attached to their master conntrack (I'm
>> refering to the RELATED state in iptables).
>>
>> Expectations usually have a short lifetime and they occur in early
>> stages of the flow establishment. I consider that synchronizing
>> expectations do not help too much to improve availability under recovery
>> situations but it requires extra computational resources for this.
> 
> Thank you very much for replying to my mail so quickly.
> 
> Yes I agree with you in some ways. However, I am working on SIP-capable
> firewalls and the SIP Applicative Layer Gateway in netfilter
> (nf_conntrack_sip) retrieves ports needed for the RTP traffic in the SIP
> message body and adds them in the expectation table. So, when the Master
> goes down the Backup doesn't know them and all RTP packets are dropped.

Indeed, as for now (conntrack-tools 0.9.14) we don't support SIP yet,
but it would require extra implementation work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux