Re: [Question] netfilter, xt_target->target and xt_target->checkentry locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 2010-06-09 14:21, Jiri Pirko wrote:

>Hi Patrick.
>
>Once module registers it's struct xt_target by xt_register_target and 
>->target and ->checkentry funtions are called later, is there any lock 
>guaranteed to be held?
>From what I see for ->target it looks like rcu_read_lock is held, but 
>I'm not sure for all paths. There would be nice to put a comment into 
>struct xt_target definition regarding locks.

Though nf_hook_slow invokes rcu_read_lock, that should not be a formal
guarantee that Xtables extensions run with RCU. See xt_TCPMSS for 
example.

>Asking because I found several places where dev->br_port is
>referenced directly (without rcu_dereference).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux