Re: Port Knocking with default hooks/modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 2010-05-17 02:09, Curby wrote:

>Hello, I want to implement port knocking on a dual-homed router.
>After the router receives the correct knocking sequence, it will allow
>SSH connections to be forwarded into the internal SSH server.  While I
>can see the knocking sequence work, the actual SSH attempt never goes
>through.  Below are the relevant rules from iptables-save complete
>with counters showing that everything works besides the last step,
>which doesn't match.  Can you see what's wrong?

It doesn't use the much simpler -m pknock from Xtables-addons ;)

>[...]
>I find it interesting that searching the archives for port knocking
>doesn't bring up anything more recent than 2008.  Going mildly off
>topic, is port knocking now considered an ill-advised solution for
>obscuring an oft-attacked service from view?  If so, why?

"You must look beyond what you see" - the netfilter-devel list should
have a fair amount of xt_pknock exchange from 2009.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux