Re: conntrack-tools 0.9.14 can not block the connection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Friday 2010-05-07 18:17, Richard Feng wrote:
>>
>>>> >From the documentation (from conntrack-tools.netfilter.org),
>>>>> somewhere it says that "have to set
>>>>> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal to
>>>>> zero".There is simply no 'netfilter' folder under my folder
>>>>> '/proc/sys/net/ipv4'. Is this the problem? How could I fix it?
>>> So 'conntrack -D' can not really cut current connections?  It can
>>> only delete entry from the state table? I just want to make sure -
>> >from the document
>>> "http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/manual.html#conntrack";. It
>>> clearly said "Delete on entry, this can be used to block traffic
>>> (you have to set
>>> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal to zero)".
>> The documentation seems to be off here. If you only delete a ct
>> entry, the next packet (even if a TCP ACK or something) will make
>> a new ct with NEW as a ctstate.
>>
>> To really have a TCP/SCTP connection blocked after deletion of the ct 
>> entry, you have to only allow NEW ctstates with the initla TCP/SCTP 
>> packet (SYN/INIT).
> 
> Yes, you need a well-formed stateful rule-set "to cut" the connection
> (at least you have to add a rule to block traffic in INVALID stats).

With "stats" I meant "state", and liberal tracking must be disabled as said.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux