Because nobody commented this so far on the 'linux-netdev' list, now a
re-post on the 'netfilter' list with a kind request for confirmation
and/or discussion...
###################################################################
Hi,
we encountered a weird problem of a 'stalled' connection when using
'conntrack -F' on a box with heavy network load. 'conntrack -L' gave us
sometimes a [UNREPLIED] entry for the traffic in question, but no traffic
flow, no matching of packets in or out, only the timer went down from 600
to 0 (it was ESP traffic - the default generic timeout = 600 seconds).
After the entry vanished by timeout (or doing a 'conntrack -F' once more),
all worked normal again.
The reason we finally found, is a race window in 'nf_conntrack_confirm'
when calling '__nf_conntrack_confirm':
In 'nf_conntrack_confirm' is checked (without holding a lock), if the entry
to be confirmed is possibly dying: !nf_ct_is_dying(ct).
If not, then __nf_conntrack_confirm will do some sanity checking, grab a
spin_lock_bh and insert the 'ct' into the lookup cache.
Now consider the following scenario:
1. a connection has seen the first packet already -> state is UNREPLIED
2. now the answer is to be sent, conntrack wants to confirm the connection
3. the !nf_ct_is_dying(ct) check is passed, __nf_conntrack_confirm is just
started
4. in a user context a 'conntrack -F' command is running right now e.g. on
another CPU
5. this will flag all unconfirmed connections as 'dying' in
get_next_corpse(...), including the entry going to be confirmed!
6. now the already 'dying' entry is included into the hash cache in
__nf_conntrack_confirm - BOOM!
After this step the connection in question is dead, because no packets are
forwarded until the entry is purged from hash cache. This was a big blocker
for us, because each dead IPsec tunnel is a dead branch network for 10
minutes...
For every packet from now on 'nf_conntrack_find_get' will ignore the entry,
because it is dying and because __nf_conntrack_confirm finds the hash in
the cache already, it will NF_DROP the packet.
The key for finding this was 'NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, insert_failed)' in
__nf_conntrack_confirm.
The suggested solution is to check for '!nf_ct_is_dying(ct)' again, _after_
the spin_lock_bh is grabbed in __nf_conntrack_confirm. So it is clear, that
no other softirq or user context can set that 'evil' dying flag ;-)
The return value in this case should be NF_ACCEPT, so we loose no packets
then, this is also important for us.
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 1374179..e2c8bfe 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -413,6 +413,11 @@ __nf_conntrack_confirm(struct sk_buff *skb)
spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
+ if (unlikely(nf_ct_is_dying(ct))) {
+ spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
+ return NF_ACCEPT;
+ }
+
/* See if there's one in the list already, including reverse:
NAT could have grabbed it without realizing, since we're
not in the hash. If there is, we lost race. */
-- 1.5.6.5
Best regards
Joerg.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
