Re: [question] ipt_CLUSTERIP and address length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I want to ask if there is any particular reason for ipt_CLUSTERIP to support
>> only address length of 6 (ETH_ALEN)? It seems to me reasonable for this to work
>> even with another types of network hw with different addr_len.
> 
> None that I'm aware of, but the length is also used in the ABI,
> so you presently can't supply larger addresses.

Not directly related to this but I wanted to discuss this time ago. Now
that we have xt_CLUSTER I think that we can deprecate ipt_CLUSTERIP.

With regards to this issue, it seems arptables only support EUI-48 (6
bytes) for ethernet addresses, so xt_CLUSTER would inherit the same
problem but the point would be to fix arptables (not sure if possible
now without breaking ABI or adding some versioning like iptables).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux