Re: [question] ipt_CLUSTERIP and address length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:04:23PM CET, jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>On Thursday 2010-02-25 11:23, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>> 
>>> I want to ask if there is any particular reason for ipt_CLUSTERIP
>>> to support only address length of 6 (ETH_ALEN)? It seems to me
>>> reasonable for this to work even with another types of network hw
>>> with different addr_len.
>>
>>None that I'm aware of, but the length is also used in the ABI,
>>so you presently can't supply larger addresses.
>
>The larger picture is that there seems to be quite a bit of ABI
>even outside of the kernel that uses ETH_ALEN and/or ETH_HLEN
>in many places; for example, the tcpdump cooked interface IIRC.

Hmm, thats sad :( IMHO this should be ETH independent...

>
>Is there an _actual_ use case however? Is it suddenly possible
>to use EUI-64s? Or a run on IPX? :-)

Well for example Infiniband has 20-bytes address. But I do not know much about
this kinds of hw & iptables use. I'm just looking at code and wondering :)

Jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux