Re: nf_conntrack_sip and nf_nat_sip can do this??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hello,

I have detected in my scenario that during an internal communication between two Eyebeam terminals, nf_conntrack_sip and nf_nat_sip work fine in the SDP part although not in the SIP header. The result is that RTP streams go between them and not to my gateway as before. However, just substituting one Eyebeam terminal by the IMS one I am using (Mercuro IMS client) the problem again appears.

Which is the difference between using one or the other type of terminal in this case?

Thanks in advance,
Rebeca

"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:

rebeca.martinez-garcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Hello,

I have gzip'ed them.
I hope this time you do not have problems while saving.

Works fine, thanks, I'll have a closer look.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux