Re: iptables MARK + ip rule fwmark on locally generated packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fredrik Ax wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> So, to accomplish this I would have to oute it through a dummy
>>> interface to make iptables able to mark it before it goes out?
>> You need some criteria for your routing rules that is available
>> when the socket is routed. That's everything but the packet mark.
>> Using a seperate device will work.
>>
>> For ethernet, the macvlan device might be a good choice if you
>> don't mind using different MAC addresses for each IP.
> 
> Thanks, I'll have a look at it ... 
> 
> Just one more question, the host is actually run as a domU on XEN and
> all of the eth2-4 interfaces are on a in dom0 created bridge, bridging
> in a vlan where the tagged traffic is on a blanace-rr bond-device.
> 
> Would it create any problems creating a macvlan device on top of this?

No, that should be fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux