Re: Understanding conntrack: Delete and manual readd of same entry possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
Roman Fiedler wrote:
Thanks for the patch. When I've played with the same problem at home I've
guessed that it is something with sequence numbers and that setting tcp-liberal
in a netlink test application is a workaround for the DROP. But I did not
bring it to that point that I could create a clean patch because there were still some loose ends. Perhaps someone could help me to fix some of these:

a) When conntrackd inserts the entries, does it set the liberal also? If yes, is it correct, that a failover via conntrackd would disable sequence number
tracking for all existing entries?

Yes, this is the way it works by now, but it would be easy to make a patch not to disable it. I'm going to prepare one now that conntrack-tools 0.9.14 is out. I'll let you know, you may want to help me doing some testing.

BTW, conntrackd does not set to liberal other entries that already exists in the kernel (in case that you have some active-active setup). So only the injected entries are set to liberal by now. I think that this replies to the second part of your question, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Netfilter Development]     [Linux Kernel Networking Development]     [Netem]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux